The gemara (Shabbos 88b-89a) relates a fascinating event that happened when Moshe ascended to heaven to receive the Torah.
The angels protested the giving of this valuable treasure that had been hidden for nearly 1000 generations prior to Creation to a flesh and blood man, "born of woman". God instructs Moshe himself to address their claim, at which point he grasps the Throne of Glory and proceeds to respond to their criticism. Using the Ten Commandments as his template, Moshe proceeds to demonstrate that the Torah is specifically designed for humans who are capable of exercising free will and must contend with all the challenges of being human. At this point the angels are mollified, and not only do they ally themselves with him, but they also provide Moshe with gifts; the Angel of Death himself shares the secret of the incense and its life-restoring qualities.
In Nefesh HaChaim, Reb Chaim of Volozhin examines the difference between humans and angels. It's not so much that humans are greater than angels - on the contrary, in all respects but one, angels are far superior to humans in terms of inherent holiness, purity, and the like. However, the angel is limited in one aspect that the human is not: the potential to affect other realms with his actions, and have an impact beyond the immediate surroundings.
The angel is described as stationary; its appearance gives off the impression of a single leg, i.e. the inability to move. However, man is described as a composite, a microcosm of all the different worlds beyond that of our physical plane of existence; he is termed a mehalech - a walker (related to the reason why the corpus of Jewish law is called halacha). Everything he does has an effect that endures forever, and has far reaching ramifications. As we see in this week's parsha, Moshe "[T]urned this way and that and saw that there was no man..." (Ex. 2:12); this is explained as Moshe utilizing ruach haKodesh to determine that no future converts would come from this Egyptian before killing him.
This singularly human ability accords us with a tremendous amount of responsibility. The realization that our decisions and actions have enduring repercussions that stems from our development as creatures of action and flux may no doubt create a certain amount of existential angst. But that is no reason to shy away from our duties while we are here on Earth. There is no way to avoid it; even our inaction has serious causal effect on future generations (sometimes by cutting off the continued growth of our descendants, God forbid).
Of late, there has been a movement toward a more positively-oriented perspective in psychology, built around a pursuit of happiness. Many philosophically minded psychologists have attempted to define what happiness is and how it is attained. Concurrently, they have devised many practical interventions toward this end of cultivating happiness - many of which have tremendous benefits for those who take the time and care to implement them properly. This is a very good step in the right direction; after all, the Ba'al Shem Tov and others stressed the importance of serving HaShem with joy, a concept that should be a basic tenet of Judaism but somehow gets lost in translation sometimes (in fact, it is biblical in nature - "...tachat asher lo avadeta et HaShem b'simcha").
But many of these scholars lose sight of the main goal, seeing happiness as an end in itself. Happiness is a subjective concept that can prove elusive when placed as a desired achievement. A corollary of this attitude is the mistaken notion that pain or discomfort is unhelpful, unwanted, unnecessary; conflict is something that should be avoided as much as possible. This is not the case. The existential struggles and tests that we must go through are what galvanize us to continue, to grow, to keep moving and improving. They give us a sense of responsibility to others as well as ourselves. Frankl called this a "will to meaning"; the Torah itself asserts that "man is born to toil". Only through hard work and dedication is it possible to truly achieve anything in life - and when we feel that we are working for something important, the satisfaction and self assurance is more valuable than any other type of happiness.
Monday, December 31, 2012
Sunday, December 30, 2012
...and the kitchen sink, too.
My wonderful children don't really have a concept of seasonal time yet, so they're more than willing to listen to holiday-related tapes at random times throughout the year. Favorites are timeless, I guess.
Thankfully, some of their favorites include tapes I listened to as a child, including Cleveland's very own Torahvision series' The Purim Story. A classic, my kids are always up for another listen - case in point, this morning.
Listening with half an ear reminded me of a story I heard involving Rav Yitzchak Hutner OBM. One summer, Rav Hutner and his wife went up to Camp Morris (the summer camp affiliated with Yeshivas Chaim Berlin) to visit for a Shabbos. On Sunday morning, the couple came to the dining room following shacharis for breakfast.
Eager to please, the waiter charged with catering to the Hutners asked them what they wanted for breakfast. When Rav Hutner asked what they had, he launched into a litany of dishes, rattling off with breathtaking speed a menu that boasted hardboiled, softboiled, fried, scrambled, sunnyside up and poached eggs; belgian and regular waffles, french toast, pancakes; freshly squeezed orange juice, brewed or instant coffee, hot cereal like oatmeal and farina, or any choice of various cold cereals. Bagels, rye bread, white bread served plain or toasted with jam, mergarine, or butter - anything the Hutners wanted could be provided.
Rav Hutner - who was known for his wit as well as his size - smiled at the waiter, leaned back in his chair. Placing both hands on his stomach, he sang with the trop of the megilla: "Al tapel davar m'kol asher dibarta! And do not leave out anything from which you mentioned!" (Esther 6:10)
Thankfully, some of their favorites include tapes I listened to as a child, including Cleveland's very own Torahvision series' The Purim Story. A classic, my kids are always up for another listen - case in point, this morning.
Listening with half an ear reminded me of a story I heard involving Rav Yitzchak Hutner OBM. One summer, Rav Hutner and his wife went up to Camp Morris (the summer camp affiliated with Yeshivas Chaim Berlin) to visit for a Shabbos. On Sunday morning, the couple came to the dining room following shacharis for breakfast.
Eager to please, the waiter charged with catering to the Hutners asked them what they wanted for breakfast. When Rav Hutner asked what they had, he launched into a litany of dishes, rattling off with breathtaking speed a menu that boasted hardboiled, softboiled, fried, scrambled, sunnyside up and poached eggs; belgian and regular waffles, french toast, pancakes; freshly squeezed orange juice, brewed or instant coffee, hot cereal like oatmeal and farina, or any choice of various cold cereals. Bagels, rye bread, white bread served plain or toasted with jam, mergarine, or butter - anything the Hutners wanted could be provided.
Rav Hutner - who was known for his wit as well as his size - smiled at the waiter, leaned back in his chair. Placing both hands on his stomach, he sang with the trop of the megilla: "Al tapel davar m'kol asher dibarta! And do not leave out anything from which you mentioned!" (Esther 6:10)
Friday, December 28, 2012
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Brain teaser...
A glorious "no prize" for anyone who can come up with the solution to this riddle:
How is it possible to speak for a minute straight without ever using the letter "A"?
How is it possible to speak for a minute straight without ever using the letter "A"?
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
The Imperative of Chanuka
Words of encouragement and exhortation from the Lubavitcher Rebbe OBM...
And a contemporary tzaddik, the Tolna Rebbe of Jerusalem, at the first night's lighting this year:
Anyone with a yiddish translation would be welcomed...
And a contemporary tzaddik, the Tolna Rebbe of Jerusalem, at the first night's lighting this year:
Anyone with a yiddish translation would be welcomed...
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Holy Incandescence
We are not always fit for elevated spiritual experiences. Those many instances that lack any elevated illumination are to be dedicated to exoteric Torah learning and practical service of God.Much as we would like our lives to be more peaks than valleys, and indeed we can strive toward that goal of allowing our souls to flourish and expand into the world, we have to know how to stay well grounded as well and utilize our time wisely in the interim. But like Reb Kalonymos Kalman says in many places: once the "doors to the prison" are open and we have that time - we should make the most of our visitation!
But when the light of our soul bursts forth, we must immediately give that light its freedom, so that we may unfold, visualize, imagine, grow wise and attain, aspire and yearn to the highest heights, to the source of our root, to the life of our soul, to the light of the life of the soul of all universes, to the light of the supernal God, to His goodness and beauty.- Rav Kook, Orot Hakodesh 10:2
Chanukah is one of those times when the light of the Torah sheBa'al Peh shines forth. Everything about Chanukah is so very deep, deeper than words can ever describe. As the only yom tov that was established after the redaction of the Torah sheb'Ktav, Chanukah is the one holiday that is tailored for us here in exile, so far from where we once were and yet getting closer with every passing day.
May the light of Chanukah spread out and illuminate the world with the light of Moshiach permanently this time!
Thursday, December 6, 2012
8th Day/ Kids of Courage
The 8th Day is one of those few bands that has universal appeal in my family; their albums are on regular rotation here...
A sweet video for an important cause...
Monday, December 3, 2012
Sale at Kehot Online!
In honor of 19 & 20 Kislev, the folks at Kehot Online are making a massive sale, up to 40% off their inventory. I've been waiting for this sale since the summer after reading Rabbi Benzion Twerski's essay in Klal Perspectives where he mentions a sefer he has been learning, Lilmod Eich L'Hitpallel...
Check out the sale - there's something for everyone, and it's continuing today and tomorrow!
Check out the sale - there's something for everyone, and it's continuing today and tomorrow!
It's Close To You
L'kavod Yud Tes Kislev.
An unsettling experience: I didn't realize this morning that it was Yat Kislev until my chavruta reminded me. This is my first year completely out of the yeshiva environment, and it's a timely lesson that I have to take steps to ensure that things don't just slip by when I'm not paying attention.
An unsettling experience: I didn't realize this morning that it was Yat Kislev until my chavruta reminded me. This is my first year completely out of the yeshiva environment, and it's a timely lesson that I have to take steps to ensure that things don't just slip by when I'm not paying attention.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Interesting research
We've touched upon similar ideas presented in this article when discussing some of Reb Kalonymous Kalman's advice. Similarly, the author of Bilvavi Mishkan Evneh mentions a very specific technique that seems to be in line with this research, among other Torah sources...
Bothered by Negative, Unwanted Thoughts? Just Throw Them Away - Association for Psychological Science
(please be advised that the findings appear to be preliminary)
Bothered by Negative, Unwanted Thoughts? Just Throw Them Away - Association for Psychological Science
(please be advised that the findings appear to be preliminary)
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Just Cause
I've been mulling over a new thought I saw this week in Ohr Gedalyahu, who quotes the Medrash Tanchuma that Yaakov's departure from the Holy Land was an aspect of exile (Yaakov's "taking" the birthright effectively severed Esav's spiritual life. One who cuts a life short - albeit unintentionally - must go into exile).
Within the context of this idea, Rav Schorr refers to the fact that the exile was essentially a decree from our forefather Avraham; at the bris bein habesarim it was established that Avraham's decendents would be exiles, wandering from country to country. Nevertheless, although a decree may be set for generations, in every generation there must be some sort of pretense to "warrant" the decree, no matter how tenuous. Case in point, the birthright in last week's parsha.
I'm not sure I understand this correctly. This idea of needing a "siba" as Rav Schorr puts it is intriguing; it seems like one of those many instances where God plays by "the rules" of our finite human intellect; we (humans) look for causality, and it would seem "unjust" for Him to visit upon one's progeny hardship apropos of nothing, so He finds something to hang it on.
But why? This cannot be the only reason (if it applies at all), because what happened to "For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways My way..."? The Holy One answers to no one, nor can anyone really question him. Is there a deeper insight in this concept of finding a pretense?
Any thoughts are appreciated.
Within the context of this idea, Rav Schorr refers to the fact that the exile was essentially a decree from our forefather Avraham; at the bris bein habesarim it was established that Avraham's decendents would be exiles, wandering from country to country. Nevertheless, although a decree may be set for generations, in every generation there must be some sort of pretense to "warrant" the decree, no matter how tenuous. Case in point, the birthright in last week's parsha.
I'm not sure I understand this correctly. This idea of needing a "siba" as Rav Schorr puts it is intriguing; it seems like one of those many instances where God plays by "the rules" of our finite human intellect; we (humans) look for causality, and it would seem "unjust" for Him to visit upon one's progeny hardship apropos of nothing, so He finds something to hang it on.
But why? This cannot be the only reason (if it applies at all), because what happened to "For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways My way..."? The Holy One answers to no one, nor can anyone really question him. Is there a deeper insight in this concept of finding a pretense?
Any thoughts are appreciated.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Monday, November 12, 2012
Follow Up...
...to the last post:
My father, he should live and be well, offered the following insight gleaned from the teachings of Rav Schwab and Rav Pam: the Torah is teaching us the ideal role of the shadchan in terms of how he (or she) should perceive himself and his role in the process of making the match. From the fact that Eliezer's name is not mentioned in the Parsha at all, we learn that vis-a-vis the prospective match, there can be no personal interest on the matchmaker's part at all. There must be an abnegation of sorts, with the matchmaker dedicated to the singular task of bringing this couple together without any ulterior motives (no matter how admirable). It is straight advocacy for the others, free of any self serving motive.
As to why he's alternately referred to as Eved and Ish, I still don't have any answer. My initial hypothesis that the distinction is when Eliezer exercises his autonomy (i.e. when he's carrying out the mission of Avraham, he is in his capacity of servant, and when he must make his own calls in the field, he becomes a Man) such as conversing with Lavan and Besuel fell through; first of all, the verses do not reflect that, and the commentators make a point of asserting that especially when Eliezer used his own initiative it was in his role as a loyal servant.
After going through it again Shabbos morning, I realized that the Torah specifically calls Eliezer a "man" during his interactions with Rivka - even after Rivka announces his arrival (again calling him a "man") to her family, once he reveals his identity, the Torah reverts to his title of servant.
Perhaps we can suggest an answer that works on two levels: according to the simple meaning, maybe Rivka didn't recognize him as a servant, and innocently referred to him as a free individual - the Torah would reflect that assumption until the confusion is cleared when Eliezer introduces himself. On a deeper level, maybe we can say that the Torah is teaching us an additional quality of Rivka: that same chesed that she extended to Eliezer and his entourage in deed was also present in her attitude towards people. Despite the fact that Eliezer was a servant - in many places, likely considered a second-class citizen - she regarded him as a person, as a human being worthy of being treated as such. So long as she interacts with him, and accords him respect and dignity, he is a man. And Eliezer recognizes this, but still maintains that above all else, he is a loyal servant to Avraham.
As far as I know, this is totally my own, and if it's totally off, please let me know. If it is corroborated somewhere, also please let me know...
My father, he should live and be well, offered the following insight gleaned from the teachings of Rav Schwab and Rav Pam: the Torah is teaching us the ideal role of the shadchan in terms of how he (or she) should perceive himself and his role in the process of making the match. From the fact that Eliezer's name is not mentioned in the Parsha at all, we learn that vis-a-vis the prospective match, there can be no personal interest on the matchmaker's part at all. There must be an abnegation of sorts, with the matchmaker dedicated to the singular task of bringing this couple together without any ulterior motives (no matter how admirable). It is straight advocacy for the others, free of any self serving motive.
As to why he's alternately referred to as Eved and Ish, I still don't have any answer. My initial hypothesis that the distinction is when Eliezer exercises his autonomy (i.e. when he's carrying out the mission of Avraham, he is in his capacity of servant, and when he must make his own calls in the field, he becomes a Man) such as conversing with Lavan and Besuel fell through; first of all, the verses do not reflect that, and the commentators make a point of asserting that especially when Eliezer used his own initiative it was in his role as a loyal servant.
After going through it again Shabbos morning, I realized that the Torah specifically calls Eliezer a "man" during his interactions with Rivka - even after Rivka announces his arrival (again calling him a "man") to her family, once he reveals his identity, the Torah reverts to his title of servant.
Perhaps we can suggest an answer that works on two levels: according to the simple meaning, maybe Rivka didn't recognize him as a servant, and innocently referred to him as a free individual - the Torah would reflect that assumption until the confusion is cleared when Eliezer introduces himself. On a deeper level, maybe we can say that the Torah is teaching us an additional quality of Rivka: that same chesed that she extended to Eliezer and his entourage in deed was also present in her attitude towards people. Despite the fact that Eliezer was a servant - in many places, likely considered a second-class citizen - she regarded him as a person, as a human being worthy of being treated as such. So long as she interacts with him, and accords him respect and dignity, he is a man. And Eliezer recognizes this, but still maintains that above all else, he is a loyal servant to Avraham.
As far as I know, this is totally my own, and if it's totally off, please let me know. If it is corroborated somewhere, also please let me know...
Friday, November 9, 2012
Looking for resources...
...about how the Torah does not mention Eliezer by name at all throughout this week's parsha. Also for any significance in terms of the alternating uses of "the Man" and "the Slave/Servant".
A matter of Time
An hour-long segment about time. Although it's not a Jewish program, there's a lot of rich material in this show to ponder, especially as we enter into Shabbos Kodesh...
This hour of Radiolab, we try our hand at unlocking the mysteries of time.
Jorge Luis Borges wrote, "Time is the substance from which I am made. Time is a river which carries me along, but I am the river; it is a tiger that devours me, but I am the tiger; it is a fire that consumes me, but I am the fire." And it’s still as close a definition as we have. We stretch and bend time, wrestle with its subjective nature, and wrap our minds around strategies to standardize it...stopping along the way at a 19th-century railroad station in Ohio, a track meet, and a Beethoven concert.
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
The value of modest speech.
There is something to be said about not saying some things. - Me
Two days ago I came across a gemara that I find pertinent in this day and age.
The gemara (TB Shabbos 33a) goes through several sins and their commensurate punishments. Regarding vulgar speech there is a statement that when someone goes to the trouble of explicitly stating the obvious (the gemara uses the example of a bride approaching the wedding canopy; everyone *knows* what follows, yet it is not a topic of conversation - no one points it out. But the one who makes a point of saying something...) it can overturn whatever positive reward he has accrued for the next seventy years.
This is such a timely message for our generation. We live in a world that is increasingly bolder - we tend to become impatient with euphemisms and "beating around the bush". "Just call a spade a spade!" "I have to tell it like it is," and so on. Our society believes that there is more merit to having full disclosure than expressing things in a demure fashion.
This affects relationships as well: "get it out, or it will fester inside you!" While I certainly advocate clear communication, it has to be done properly; just saying things as they pop into one's head is a way to ensure that the chasm widens.
I had a professor in undergraduate who made a point of using profanity (the "seven deadly words", and then some) in class, because it "said it best".
This is one of the things that I believe has contributed to the dumbing down of the media. I have witnessed an increasing usage of lowbrow language in formerly respectable magazines, as a younger generation of "journalists" have entered the fray. It gets worse with online media - and the biggest tragedy to me is the tremendous amount of "culturally Jewish" content that puts out coarse, disgusting (and poorly written) material out into cyberspace. It doesn't make you look hip or advant-garde, only inarticulate and immature.
But this blog is about positivity and increasing light, so I will try and do my part to produce worthy reading...
Also, an earlier daf of gemara has me singing one of my favorite songs:
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Rebbe Shlomo on the Satmar Rav
Lest you think that I forgot it was also (actually, first) Rebbe Shlomo's yahrtzeit week...
Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan on Shema
An audio posted to YouTube with an excerpt from Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan's Jewish Meditation.
Embedding was disabled, so you'll have to follow the link to hear it.
Embedding was disabled, so you'll have to follow the link to hear it.
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Rav Elazar Menachem Man Shach OBM
I've been saving this for today, the 16th of Mar Cheshvan, Rav Elazar Menachem Man Shach's yahrtzeit. I read it this year in Song of Teshuvah by Rav Moshe Weinberger:
But one comment that his son Dr. Ephraim Shach made about finally realizing that Rav Shach's entire worldview was through the prism of Torah sheds some light:
Perhaps the answer is "yes" - certainly for us down here dealing with all of our nisyonot. Perhaps one can say that this might have been Rav Shach's nisayon. Perhaps, but I don't think we can say one way or another, and we should look at his life as an example of what our lives could look like if we strove to have that same level of dedication. At the end of the day, the stories of his "meshugass" (I shudder at phrasing it that way, but it's for the sake of making a point) in contrast to our own craziness...? I know which one I would prefer to have.
There is a lot more to say about this topic and the general problem I see with our (and I include myself in this) hubris in assuming that we're on any similar level with certain individuals. That we have the gall to say "I disagree with Rav _______" on a given subject that we maybe have some familiarity with, and certainly not the specific details or cheshbonot involved in a specific discussion is a sign of real unprecedented chutzpah.
I believe that one source of this problem is the proliferation of media that enables everybody to espouse hisunsolicited opinion on any topic under the sun*. This use to happen in the mikvah and at kiddush clubs and around the water cooler on a regular basis; it's not a new phenomenon that one fellow who has the right amount of charisma, bluster, and confidence can hold forth on any subject to his rapt audience, of course. But now it has become global and more vocal, and these people find reinforcement among like-minded individuals, so it becomes a self-perpetuating problem to a dangerously larger degree.
Sorry about the rant, but a comment from last year's post set this off.
* yes, I caught the irony. It goes without saying that I am guilty as charged, I think.
There was a Chassidic Jew in Bnei Brak who had lost everything during WWII and was spiritually broken. One day he came to pour his heart out to Rav Menachem Man Shach, who was not at all Chassidic, but who understood full well the pain of a broken Chassidic heart.This Jew told what had happened to him and said, “I cannot even pray anymore.”Rav Shach said, “What Chassidic group do you belong to?”The man told him, and Rav Shach began to hum a niggun, a tune, from that group. The Chassid closed his eyes and hummed the niggun together with Rav Shach, until he started to cry.
Rav Shach said, “For a Chassid, it’s not enough to sing a niggun. We have to dance.” So Rav Shach stood up and danced with this Jew for a long time.Afterwards this Jew could pray again. Rav Shach did not give him a theological explanation about where God was during the Holocaust.
He knew that this niggun was still inside that Jew, hidden underneath the pile of ashes from Auschwitz.A lot of people presume to know the mind of this gadol, not to mention that they seek to question his status of a gadol to begin with. I cannot honestly say that I understand him, and there are many things that I do not understand about his positions on many issues.
But one comment that his son Dr. Ephraim Shach made about finally realizing that Rav Shach's entire worldview was through the prism of Torah sheds some light:
"חזרתי לדבר איתו אחרי שנה, אבל להבין את הצד שלו הבנתי רק ב-71', כשאבא שכב בבית החולים תל-השומר. גילו אצלו סרטן והוא עמד בפני ניתוח. פתאום הוא אמר לי שהוא רוצה שאקח אותו חזרה הביתה, כי אין לו בבית החולים אפשרות ללמוד כמו בבית. אז הבנתי שאין מה לעשות – לימוד תורה קודם אצלו לכול, גם לבריאות שלו
I started speaking to him again a year after [Mother's death], but I only understood his position in '71, when Father was hospitalized in Tel HaShomer. He was diagnosed with cancer, waiting to be operated on. Suddenly he told me he wanted me to take him home, because he couldn't learn in the hospital the way he could at home. Then I understood that there was nothing to do - learning Torah came before everything for him, even his own health.Many might shake their heads in a mixture of astonishment and incredulity; how can we possibly relate to that level of commitment? Some might even criticize that single-minded dedication to one element - after all, doesn't it say v'chai bahem, that we are meant to live by the Torah which includes taking care of ourselves?
Perhaps the answer is "yes" - certainly for us down here dealing with all of our nisyonot. Perhaps one can say that this might have been Rav Shach's nisayon. Perhaps, but I don't think we can say one way or another, and we should look at his life as an example of what our lives could look like if we strove to have that same level of dedication. At the end of the day, the stories of his "meshugass" (I shudder at phrasing it that way, but it's for the sake of making a point) in contrast to our own craziness...? I know which one I would prefer to have.
There is a lot more to say about this topic and the general problem I see with our (and I include myself in this) hubris in assuming that we're on any similar level with certain individuals. That we have the gall to say "I disagree with Rav _______" on a given subject that we maybe have some familiarity with, and certainly not the specific details or cheshbonot involved in a specific discussion is a sign of real unprecedented chutzpah.
I believe that one source of this problem is the proliferation of media that enables everybody to espouse his
Sorry about the rant, but a comment from last year's post set this off.
* yes, I caught the irony. It goes without saying that I am guilty as charged, I think.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
A recent post by Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner reminded me of a great story:
There was a young student who one day began contemplating the conundrum of Divine Foreknowledge versus Free Will. The more he thought about it. the more distressed he became - after all, how was it possible that he could have any choice at all, if God supposedly knows everything that will happen, as a matter of fact, makes it happen?
Unable to wrap his head around this ages-old paradox, he began slipping in his faith in an omniscient God. "If we have free will," he reasoned, "then God must not really know what our thoughts are. But if that's the case, then can God really be all that powerful?" His friends and relatives saw how this preoccupation was affecting the youth, and so they suggested that he go see Reb Pinchas of Koretz, the chasidic master, and pose the question to him: Does God know what Man thinks?
After a long trip, the young man - not one prone to visiting those of the chasidic persuasion - reached Reb Pinchas' home. When he entered the study Reb Pinchas was learning Torah, and he looked up at the student with his penetrating gaze. "Reb Yid!" exclaimed Reb Pinchas, "if I can tell what you're thinking, wouldn't you agree that the Holy One, Blessed Is He can obviously do the same?"
There was a young student who one day began contemplating the conundrum of Divine Foreknowledge versus Free Will. The more he thought about it. the more distressed he became - after all, how was it possible that he could have any choice at all, if God supposedly knows everything that will happen, as a matter of fact, makes it happen?
Unable to wrap his head around this ages-old paradox, he began slipping in his faith in an omniscient God. "If we have free will," he reasoned, "then God must not really know what our thoughts are. But if that's the case, then can God really be all that powerful?" His friends and relatives saw how this preoccupation was affecting the youth, and so they suggested that he go see Reb Pinchas of Koretz, the chasidic master, and pose the question to him: Does God know what Man thinks?
After a long trip, the young man - not one prone to visiting those of the chasidic persuasion - reached Reb Pinchas' home. When he entered the study Reb Pinchas was learning Torah, and he looked up at the student with his penetrating gaze. "Reb Yid!" exclaimed Reb Pinchas, "if I can tell what you're thinking, wouldn't you agree that the Holy One, Blessed Is He can obviously do the same?"
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Soul Geology
In the Earth, there are so many wonderful treasures. And if you know where to dig, you will find gold, diamonds, jewelry, all kinds of treasures.
But if you don't know where to dig, all you will find is rocks and dirt.
The Rebbe is the geologist of the soul; he can show you where to dig, and what to dig for - but the digging you must do yourself.Intro/Outro sample on Searching from Matisyahu's Spark Seeker.
I think that the sample is taken from a lecture given by Rabbi J. Immanuel Schochet, who develops this concept in Chasidic Dimensions.
Free shiur from Rav Moshe Weinberger
From this past motzei Shabbos at the hilulla of Rav Kalonymos Kalman Shapira, the Piaseczna Rebbe zt"l hy"d. Unfortunately I couldn't make it, as I was spending time with my father and his siblings at the shiva for my grandfather A"H.
Here's the link for the shiur; I haven't listened to it yet, but I'm sure it will be great! For thousands of other shiurim on the Rebbe's works, and on countless other topics that run the gamut of Torah, visit www.ravmosheweinberger.com, where a new(-ish) subscription plan allots fifty credits per month for only $6.99, with no obligations.
Here's the link for the shiur; I haven't listened to it yet, but I'm sure it will be great! For thousands of other shiurim on the Rebbe's works, and on countless other topics that run the gamut of Torah, visit www.ravmosheweinberger.com, where a new(-ish) subscription plan allots fifty credits per month for only $6.99, with no obligations.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Yay!
Reb Ally's yeshiva now has a website, where one can learn more information about the yeshiva's goals and aspirations.
Check it out!
Check it out!
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Quick Update
I didn't realize how long it's been since I updated anything to the blog. Things have been super hectic here, and while we're still trying to hold on to that spiritual infusion we got over the past few weeks, our lives in the alma d'shikra continue.
A lot has been going on lately, a lot of new changes and adjustments - some good, some less apparently so.
At the risk of being the bearer of bad news, my grandfather (my father's father) passed away this morning, and I have been mulling over what I would like to share about him. I plan on doing so at a later date (in the near future), but as it is currently Rosh Chodesh, we are not supposed to eulogize and the temptation would be too great. Please check in later this week for something more.
Besurot tovot.
A lot has been going on lately, a lot of new changes and adjustments - some good, some less apparently so.
At the risk of being the bearer of bad news, my grandfather (my father's father) passed away this morning, and I have been mulling over what I would like to share about him. I plan on doing so at a later date (in the near future), but as it is currently Rosh Chodesh, we are not supposed to eulogize and the temptation would be too great. Please check in later this week for something more.
Besurot tovot.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
An essay on Teshuva
Originally appearing in the books Deep Calling Unto Deep and To Touch the Divine, this essay by Rabbi Dr J. Immanuel Schochet is a worthy read for this time of year, especially tonight and tomorrow.
Anyone who has been learning Rav Kook's Orot HaTeshuvah will greatly appreciate much of the material presented here, and Rabbi Schochet's writing style is scholarly and comprehensive without being heavy handed. Everything progresses like a nachal novea here, and it was a pleasure to read.
Rabbi Schochet is an authority on chassidut, in particular that of ChaBaD; he has written numerous books and articles about all matters concerning chassidut including a fantastic biography of the Maggid of Mezeritch. Enjoy the article, brought to you from Chabad.org:
Anyone who has been learning Rav Kook's Orot HaTeshuvah will greatly appreciate much of the material presented here, and Rabbi Schochet's writing style is scholarly and comprehensive without being heavy handed. Everything progresses like a nachal novea here, and it was a pleasure to read.
Rabbi Schochet is an authority on chassidut, in particular that of ChaBaD; he has written numerous books and articles about all matters concerning chassidut including a fantastic biography of the Maggid of Mezeritch. Enjoy the article, brought to you from Chabad.org:
|
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Prayers Needed!
For Reb Yehuda Aryeh ben Esther Liba, a very close friend who is in serious need of a refua.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
The Avodah of Rosh HaShana
This shiur was delivered last night by Rav Moshe Weinberger; it is available for free at YUTorah, a fantastic repository of Torah and all things Judaism related online.
While you're there, check out the myriads of shiurim from Rav Hershel Schachter, Rav Mordechai Willig, Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz, our very own Reb Ally, and Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner (of The Rebbetzin's Husband blog), among many others.
While you're there, check out the myriads of shiurim from Rav Hershel Schachter, Rav Mordechai Willig, Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz, our very own Reb Ally, and Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner (of The Rebbetzin's Husband blog), among many others.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Crossing the bridge
It's 2 A.M. and you're driving on the Tappan Zee Bridge in the pouring rain when you get a flat tire. You try to pull out your spare, but you don't know where to go from there. The bridge is swaying in the wind, and it's very dark. You're wet, tired, and hungry, and it seems like you'll never get off this bridge.
All of a sudden, a lone pickup truck pulls up behind your car. The driver gets out, pulls some worn but sturdy tools from his trunk, and proceeds to change the tire in practically no time at all. You thank him profusely; to you, he's an angel sent from Heaven to get you off the bridge. You shake hands, get back in your respective cars, and continue off into the darkness, hopefully towards home. The entire way, you're praising the kindness of a stranger.
Fast forward: a few days later, you're with your family, enjoying some quality time. Your cell phone rings; it's an unfamiliar number. You answer the call to discover that it's the fellow who helped you that dark rainy night on the Tappan Zee. He's calling to check up on you, make sure everything is okay. He asks you if you need any help with anything, or maybe if you want to talk. For some reason, you feel uncomfortable - why is this guy calling you? Sure, he helped you off the bridge when you really needed it, but now his attention just seems odd...eerie, even.
After all, once you finished relating the story to a few people within the next day, you forgot about the stranger.
And, you presumed, he forgot about you...
"And that," my newest graduate professor exclaimed triumphantly, "is how you must look at the 'relationship' you share with your patients."
Pacing at the front of the classroom, he waved a bony finger. "I see this all the time - don't get involved. The therapeutic relationship is a farce. It must be so. It is a facsimile, an uncanny resemblance to an authentic relationship, and quite possibly the closest thing to an honest healthy relationship that your client has - or will ever have - experienced. But make no mistake, it is not real." Looking at each one of us in the eye before continuing, he said "When your patient is sitting in front of you, he or she is the only person who exists - but once they leave the room, it must be out of sight, out of mind. And once you have finished the treatment plan, sever all ties!
"There is no relationship, no dyad. You had a job to do and now it's done - you helped him get off the Tappan Zee in the middle of the night, no more, no less."
I appreciate the necessity of maintaining some professional distance; there are legal as well as moral reasons, and an overly involved relationship can quickly become inappropriate and damaging for both individuals involved. But my professor's opinion advocates an approach that flies in the face of why I - and I believe many of my colleagues - got involved in the mental health field in the first place. Of course, we want to help, to make a difference in the lives of people who need understanding and empathy - and this stems from a deep compassion for one's fellow human being, far beyond a utilitarian goal of forming a better functioning society. Certainly as far as Jewish values go, we are exhorted to share in the burden of our suffering brothers and sisters (this is a theme we have visited several times in the past; it is a fundamental element of how the Torah guides our interpersonal dealings, no less).
I hope that I can maintain a balance between my professionalism and my concern, in order to ensure that neither overpowers the other. But I cannot accept the directive to perceive my client as a "consumer" whose only relevance is in the immediate context of the therapy session, give or take a few moments consideration just prior to the meeting and reflection following afterward. If I was treating Jewish patient, for example, how could I not find out their full Hebrew name in order to pray for them? In my eyes, that would be as egregious an oversight as any basic part of the therapeutic process.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Great story about hiddur mitzvah
My New Year’s Resolution – With Strings Attached
Published: August 29th, 2012
“Rabbi, if you yourself are clean-shaven, why does this inmate claim his Jewish religion prohibits him from using a razor on his face?”
As the rabbi of the Orthodox synagogue in Pennsylvania’s capital city, one of the highlights of my month is a Pennsylvania Department of Corrections meeting I attend. This committee meets monthly to review religious petitions filed by Pennsylvania‘s state prison inmates.
Aside from an opportunity to (sometimes) assist remorseful Jewish inmates, these monthly get-togethers enable me to help others better understand Judaism. In addition, I always learn new details about other cultures and get a chance to interact with a diverse group of people whom I never would have otherwise met.
An incident at a recent meeting made a profound impression on me. Sitting around our conference table were the group leader, a Protestant minister (to represent all Christian groups); an Islamic Imam; me, the rabbi; a Wiccan priestess (to represent all pagan groups); a Native American spiritual leader; a prison security officer (to explain security concerns); a food-service manager (to explain the limitations of the kitchen staffs, as most requests are food-related); a legal expert (to advise the group and help the state avoid lawsuits); and a Corrections Department administrator.
A few days prior to each meeting, the participants are sent the religious accommodation requests to be reviewed. In looking through the cases in advance of that meeting, I noticed a request from an inmate who wanted to be allowed to wear a pair of tzitzis all hours of the day (not just his tallis while praying in the prison’s chapel).
When I began attending these meetings a few years ago, I brought in a new pair of tzitzis for “show and tell” so everyone in the room would understand what I was describing to them when requests such as these came in. Having already introduced the group to tzitzis, I couldn't see any reason to bring in another pair to that day’s meeting.
At this meeting, the group leader introduced me to two new faces in the room – legal interns shadowing the Department of Corrections lawyer during their summer break from law school.
When we arrived at the case of the inmate requesting tzitzis, the group leader turned to me and said, "Rabbi, our two interns have probably never seen a pair of tzitzis before, and have no idea what this request is all about. Would you mind showing them yours?"
When I asked him if he really wanted me to take off my tzitzis, he said, “Yes, it would be great for the interns to fully understand the inmate’s request.”
I loosened my tie and unbuttoned the top two buttons of my shirt. As I began pulling my tzitzis over my head, I whispered a heartfelt prayer to God that the pair of tzitzis I had put on that morning on my way tominyan was the nicest and cleanest pair I owned.
Sure enough, the garment was as clean and white as snow. The tzitzis strings were in great shape and the garment itself was perfectly ironed.
I can't begin to describe the feeling of relief I felt as my clean and ironed pair of tzitzis made their way to the interns while I explained their religious significance to the committee.
Driving home after the meeting, I called my wife, Layala, to tell her I had found yet another reason to appreciate her.
I had always asked Layala not to bother ironing my tzitzis after either of us had washed them. After all, I wear them under my shirt, where no one can see them.
Yet she insists I wear a pair of tzitzis that have been neatly ironed. Why? After crossing the Yam Suf at the height of Yetziyas Mitzrayim, our ancestors sang "Zeh Keili v'anveihu – this is my God and I will glorify Him” (Shemos 15:2). Based on this phrase, our Sages (Shabbos 133b) taught that we should try to serve God in the most beautiful manner we can. Accordingly, Layala feels if I really value the wearing oftzitzis as a mitzvah, I should be sure they are as clean and wrinkle-free as possible.
I told Layala what had occurred at that day’s meeting, and how extremely grateful I was for her devotion to the principle of "Zeh Keili v'anveihu.”
She laughed, and said she learned this from her mother, who always insists on ironing my father-in-law's freshly-washed tzitzis.
I then called my mother-in-law to tell her what had happened and jokingly thanked her for always making it a point to iron my father-in-law's tzitzis.
She laughed and said that for their entire marriage my father-in-law has asked her not to bother ironing his freshly-washed tzitzis. After all, he wears them under his shirt and no one can see them.
For all these years, however, she has insisted my father-in-law wear the cleanest and most wrinkle-free pair of tzitzis possible.
"You see!" she said, "It's a good thing I kept at it!"
I fully agreed.
Will I continue asking my wife not to iron my freshly-washed tzitzis? Absolutely. Ironing my tzitzis is something I’d like to do myself from now on.
Akiva Males is the rabbi of Harrisburg’s Kesher Israel Congregation. He can be reached atrabbimales@yahoo.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)